Jump to content

Richard_Y

Approved Member
  • Content Count

    364
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Richard_Y

  • Rank
    Over 100 posts

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Northamptonshire
  • Interests
    Music, storytelling, outdoors.
  • Towcar
    Volvo v70
  • Caravan
    Rapido Club 32T Evolution, made in 2000

Recent Profile Visitors

771 profile views
  1. Low tech plastic scraper, and decent coat and gloves while getting warmer by using it vigorously!
  2. Changed nearly 4 years ago from a gorgeous tent to our first caravan, mainly because my wife's back stopped liking floor sleeping, and because with retirement beckoning it would extend our season, even though it's significantly smaller than the tent! First 'van, now 19 years old, bought at the time. No intention of changing unless it suffers serious failure because it does pretty well what we want, we don't want the expense either, and we love it dearly. Would hope to change for another the same if we had to, assuming we could still find a decent one.
  3. Our caravan is only 5m from hitch to back plate, and has a fairly low payload but I'm aware it's more skittish when collecting from storage, so not laden with stuff we add at home, and settles down better when nearer its official limit. In contrast to Commander Dave's comment about putting gas bottles at the back, I have to work to keep the nose heavy enough. But I did wonder about the guy we saw in Scotland earlier this year loading his medium sized 'van with not just awning & poles but the chairs, table, solid looking barbecue, 3 bikes and a whole stack of crates of stuff, piled high inside. He had a whacking great pick-up truck, seemingly fairly empty, but I'd hazard a guess the van wouldn't have passed any weighbridge checks.
  4. I used to work with a couple who regularly parked their caravan at Eng. Heritage castles while doing events, so they towed it all over the country full time for months. He admitted to me having once thought he'd hitched up, set off up the M1, only to pause an hour or so later at services and find the van hitch was sitting on the ball but not clamped. Could have been far worse than what happened to you, though luckily it stayed on in his case. Not a mistake he'd make again, either!
  5. And of course none of us here has ever ever ever done such a silly thing, have we now.... wot, me???
  6. Cabanons make lovely tents, don't they, Babstreefern? We once had a frame tent by them ( which like all frame tents, took too much space in the car) then their Pyramide, last of all their Biscaya, a tunnel tent, which was glorious, shrugged off harsh weather, and was way more spacious than our 'van! We didn't get into folding campers/trailer tents, having spent too many hours packing wet canvas over the years, ( I started camping in the 1960's), between holiday camping and heavy medieval tents while working on heritage sites. And like you, all that camping experience was something we found a real advantage. Yes to caravans being more expensive in upkeep.... though I suspect our venerable little one possibly takes less outlay than some newer ones? I still found it a real learning curve with ours having such technology as it does, let alone all the aircon, heating, entertainment systems etc in more recent models! But all those years in tents probably means we're happy with less tech, so less to go wrong. Jacko1's right, yes, answers to questions on this forum have been a gold mine, no matter how stupid I sometimes felt posting them! (And will probably continue to post ) Good luck, Richard
  7. I noted on mine, before it headed for the recycling bin, that it specifies the tether is not to arrest a fall, just to restrain your movements. Hmm - I think I'd probably feel safer without it, then - if anything does slip & I fell, I wouldn't want a tethered ladder complicating my fall further!
  8. Have fun researching! We're fairly recent incomers, buying our first caravan only 3 years back, so others have much more experience, but would comment that while things have indeed moved on in 25 years, depending what you want/can afford, it may not be such a bad idea looking at older ones too as long as they're in proven good condition. Ours is nearly 20 years old, cost a fraction of new ones, and so far does the job superbly; it's already done us proud, from the remote wilds of Scottish islands to a great loop round France.
  9. We looked for a while at the idea of Gobur, 2nd hand, but found even used ones above our budget. Presumably that's a comment on their quality that they keep their price up so well. We didn't get as far as actually visiting one, though wondered if they have enough windows to be light inside? Friends of ours have a tiny 1990's Rapido folder, which they dearly love. It's very basic - nice double bed, option for 2 little bunks at t'other end, tiny kitchen inc. fridge & cooker, but no loo or washing facilities. The car barely notices it being there, apparently.
  10. Agreed! I've seen some Silvers, and wait to be corrected by any current owners reading this, but have been told Rapidos were better built. Ours certainly seems good at nearly 20 years old. The only problem I'm currently aware of is sourcing spares. (Presently seeking the draught excluder type strips which fit to the ends of the flaps which lift to become the upper sides.)
  11. My engineer recently reckoned I'd wound them down too firmly, which he said could put strain on the floor. I found this surprising, as I believe they're fastened to the chassis.
  12. I'm with you there, Ancell - more lightweights with greener material, yes. And as to pop-ups: for the 30 seconds it takes to pop the roof up, we reckon that the saving in wind resistance, and also tolls on French motorways, is well worth the slight loss of storage space. Ours isn't an Eriba, they have cult status and therefore cult price-tags, but it suits us beautifully. I can see that the previous Volvo might have been harder work, too ... our up-to-the-minute 2004 model made it all easy! However one travels, as you obviously know, the Isles are a magical destination possessing a very strong call to return.
  13. There's surely no Right and Wrong here, it's down to personal preference, but I'd like to reassure you, Ancell, that our tiny 5mx2m, 19 yr old pop-up caravan happily survived a very wind-blown few weeks on the Outer Hebrides this May without any problems, and was a dream to tow on those single track roads. And it's our firm plan to go back again, too! (Currently one of us late 60's, other 70, if you're wondering.) One of the site owners there expressed quite strongly his personal dislike of large heavy MH's driving on those same tiny roads. Again, it's all down to personal preference, but our experience here was that the caravan, parked on site, made it easier to drive an estate car round the remoter parts than a larger vehicle. But it's only fair to add that caravans were in a small minority. The only downside we could see was having to book space on the ferries. Again, a small caravan helps here. Extra hint - given the brilliance of the light (we were lucky!) driving from South to North was a good idea. Enjoy your trip.
  14. I do feel that as a small island surrounded by some of the strongest tides going, with reliable flow 365 days and nights a year, we seriously under-use their potential for clean energy. I think it's another case of the money not being poured into developing it. While the S Wales project has been the subject of much controversy, the idea's still extremely strong, and could be workable - no need for nuclear, coal, or gas, then. Then we'd move on from the "only some of the time" argument... though the present situation of not having to use all that fossil fuel for long periods is surely a good thing. Oh, and the "says it all" pic of the diesel powered electric point is sad, yes. But no, it doesn't say it all, sorry. It's one entertainingly dreadful example, not the rule.
  15. That moment was unfortunate, yes, but appears now to have been a distorted report on the basis of climate change sceptics hacking into the university's server. Wikipedia quotes an editorial in " Nature" journal stating that "A fair reading of the e-mails reveals nothing to support the denialists' conspiracy theories." It goes on - " Nature considered that emails had not shown anything that undermined the scientific case on human-caused global warming or raised any substantive reasons for concern about the researchers' own papers." The overwhelming majority of reputable scientists round the world are now thoroughly agreed both on the overall global warming trend and human beings' active responsibility. The denial argument is regarded as having been comprehensively lost, except by those with financial reasons for promoting the denial. Sadly, these include people like Murdoch, who is therefore able to shout and be heard. Incidentally, the trend to living longer is now in decline in this country, sad to say! Stevan commented on the slow rate of EV development. One big reason for this is that once oil powered ICE's were commercially growing, that was where the money was, so these were developed. If the story is true that the oil companies suppressed information and early development of other technologies back in the earlier 20th C, that would also account for a lot! Once the infrastructure is in place - and that's truly a big step, the technology will surely leap ahead. In a sad way it's a pity there isn't a pressing military need for them, that always accelerates development.
×
×
  • Create New...